Created: 23-05-2026 · Last updated: 24-09-2026


title: ARMH — Abhidhānaratnamālā (Halāyudhakośa)

ARMH — Abhidhānaratnamālā (Halāyudhakośa, ~10th c.)

The classical Sanskrit synonymic kosha by Halāyudha (~10th century CE) — a verse-format synonymic dictionary, each verse listing the synonyms of one concept. This page is a data chapter, and it is also the honest mirror case of the kośa model: the CDSL digitization is exploded — one <L> record per synonym, with set boundaries, varga names and gender all not encoded — so this chapter counts exactly what the digitization can show and labels the rest as absent.

Source: csl-orig v02/armh/armh.txt · ARMH GitHub

Trust Block

At a glance

Genre Classical Sanskrit synonymic kosha (Brahmanical)
Author / date Halāyudha, ~10th c.
Digitization model exploded — one <L> record per synonym
Records (= word forms recovered from the verses)
Verse-groups (<vn> locators)
Divisions kāṇḍas — numeric locators only, no varga tier
Full verses
Set boundaries not encoded
Gender (liṅga) marking absent in markup
CDSL role Lineage source for WIL → MW chain; cited in PWG as HALĀY.

The digitization shape, counted

Each record carries the headword (<k1>), a segmented sort key (<k2>), the page-column coordinate (<pc>) — and the verse locator (<vn>), the tag that groups the exploded records back into their verses: 7,907 <vn> tags, one per record. The locator's first field is the kāṇḍa; it never varies below it, so kāṇḍa 1–5 is the finest division the digitization encodes. Kāṇḍa 5 is the homonym book (anekārtha) — identified from its "…api…" formula, not from a heading.

What the digitization does not encode

The kośa model's orderingDevices table measures absence as honestly as presence. For ARMH the absent devices are the point: the verses carry the macrostructure, the digitization does not.

Alphabetical adjacency across the record pairs is — chance level, as expected for a concept-ordered kośa whose records happen to sit in verse order.

Chart Trust Block

ARMH beside AMAR and ABCH

Where AMAR and ABCH digitizations are grouped (one record per verse, <eid> sets, liṅga tags), ARMH's exploded records preserve the words and the verse locator but discard the set structure — the same genre at two digitization depths, which is exactly what the kośa macrostructure schema models with its unsegmented-verse set kind.

Why ARMH is in the atlas

  1. The kosha group as WIL's primary source. Wilson (WIL) and the Fort William College pandits worked from classical kosha sense-divisions to construct English glosses; ARMH is one of the principal sources of those sense-divisions.
  2. Same word, different traditions. aṃśu appears in ARMH's synonym verse for "sun" and for "ray" — the very sense-divisions WIL preserves ("A ray of light, a sun-beam... The sun...") and MW inherits. From DICT_PROFILE.md — The four Cologne koshas: aṃśu in ARMH L369 (names of the sun) and ARMH L411 (words for "ray").
  3. Cited in PWG as HALĀY. Böhtlingk-Roth cite Halāyudha explicitly; Monier-Williams collapses these citations into the anonymous <ls>L.</ls> hedge.

The four CDSL koshas

CDSL repo Title Author Date
ARMH Abhidhānaratnamālā Halāyudha ~10th c.
ABCH Abhidhānacintāmaṇi Hemacandra ~12th c.
ACPH Abhidhānacintāmaṇi-pariśiṣṭa Hemacandra ~12th c.
ACSJ Abhidhānacintāmaṇi-śiloñcha Hemacandra (attr.) ~12th c.

See also


Source: CDSL armh.txt via the kośa macrostructure model (H5328) · CC-BY-SA-4.0

Dr. Mārcis Gasūns