Sense depth

Which dictionary treats a lemma's senses most richly (UC-LX-04), measured by structural sense divisions.

Deep comparison uses validated feature adapters only. Broad coverage/overlap covers eligible local Sanskrit/BHS headwords; missing deep markup is not counted as zero evidence.

Trust Block

Evidence: src/data/dicts/sense-depth.json generated from structural sense-division markers.
Limitations: sense depth is a derived proxy; it is not a curated sense inventory and excludes prose-segmented dictionaries where the metric would mislead.
Validation: generated by npm run build-sense-depth; checked by npm test and npm run build.
Owner repo: csl-atlas.
Next use: inspect highlighted rows, then open exact dictionary source records before citing the pattern.

Sense counts are validated structural markers, not curated sense inventories. Some adapters count semantic sense divisions; specialized dictionaries may count article sections. Dictionaries without validated adapters are excluded, not counted as single-sense or zero evidence.

For lemmas present in ≥2 sense-segmented dictionaries, which one has the most sense divisions.

Large gaps usually reflect real editorial granularity plus dictionary-specific encoding units. Read the source rows before treating a gap as semantic divergence.

Generated by npm run build-sense-depth. See docs/DICTIONARY_COMPARISON_PLAN.md. CC-BY-SA-4.0.