Review queue · source-siglum aliases

Source sigla cited by only one of the tagged dictionaries (MW, AP, PWG, PWK). Each may be genuinely unique to that dictionary, or the same source another dictionary cites under a different abbreviation — in which case it should be aliased so cross-dictionary citation comparison aligns it.

This Queue Proves

This queue proves where cross-dictionary citation comparison is limited by repeated source-siglum forms that appear dictionary-specific after folding.

This Queue Does Not Prove

It does not prove that a candidate is a valid alias; each alias remains dictionary- and source-aware until reviewed.

Trust Block

Evidence: src/data/review/source-siglum-review.json, tagged dictionary citations, and the alias table in src/data/dict-source-aliases.json.
Limitations: candidates are abbreviation-normalization prompts, not source identifications or corpus attestations.
Validation: generated by npm run build-citation-apparatus; checked by npm run validate-review-reports and npm test.
Owner repo: csl-atlas.
Next use: review a small source-linked sample while preserving the canonical review fields.

Candidates are canonical sigla cited only by one tagged dictionary, at least times, after the diacritic/case fold. To merge a siglum with another dictionary's, add an alias to src/data/dict-source-aliases.json — it then aligns and leaves this queue. To record the decision here, set reviewStatus/reviewedValue (e.g. { "canonical": "p" })/reviewer in src/data/review/source-siglum-review.json; rebuilds preserve it by reviewId.

Generated by npm run build-citation-apparatus; validated by npm run validate-review-reports. Alias table: src/data/dict-source-aliases.json. CC-BY-SA-4.0.