Review queue · gender conflicts

Cross-dictionary gender disagreements among the tagged dictionaries (MW, AP, PWG, PWK, WIL), as review reports. Each is a candidate for human judgment — follow the source links and decide.

This Queue Proves

This queue proves where dictionaries assert disjoint gender/POS evidence, or where parser conventions turn a dictionary-specific grammar signal into a conflict that needs review.

This Queue Does Not Prove

It does not prove that one dictionary is wrong; many rows are legitimate convention differences or extraction limits.

Trust Block

Evidence: src/data/review/gender-conflicts-review.json, dictionary source pointers, and the review schema in data/schema/review-report.schema.json.
Limitations: this queue samples conflict classes; it is not an exhaustive philological resolution of every gender disagreement.
Validation: generated by npm run build-gender-review; checked by npm run validate-review-reports and npm test.
Owner repo: csl-atlas.
Next use: review a small source-linked sample while preserving the canonical review fields.

Gender is derived from <lex> tags (MW, AP, PWG, PWK, WIL) and prose markers (VCP, SKD); a conflict means two dictionaries assert disjoint specific genders. This page reads the review overlay (src/data/review/gender-conflicts-review.json, schema data/schema/review-report.schema.json). To record a decision, set an item's reviewStatus / reviewedValue / reviewer in that file; rebuilds preserve it by reviewId.

Generated by npm run build-gender-review; validated by npm run validate-review-reports. See docs/REVIEW_REPORTS.md. CC-BY-SA-4.0.