Review queue · gender conflicts

Cross-dictionary gender disagreements among the tagged dictionaries (MW, AP, PWG, PWK, WIL) plus the prose lexica (VCP, SKD), as review reports. Each is a candidate for human judgment — read the inline entry, open the exact source line, and decide.

This Queue Proves

This queue proves where dictionaries assert disjoint gender/POS evidence, or where parser conventions turn a dictionary-specific grammar signal into a conflict that needs review.

This Queue Does Not Prove

It does not prove that one dictionary is wrong; many rows are legitimate convention differences or extraction limits.

Trust Block

• Evidence: src/data/review/gender-conflicts-review.json, dictionary source pointers with inline snippets, and the review schema in data/schema/review-report.schema.json.
• Limitations: this queue samples conflict classes; it is not an exhaustive philological resolution of every gender disagreement.
• Validation: generated by npm run build-gender-review; checked by npm run validate-review-reports and npm test.
• Owner repo: csl-atlas.
• Next use: review a small source-linked sample while preserving the canonical review fields.

Generated by npm run build-gender-review; validated by npm run validate-review-reports. See docs/REVIEW_REPORTS.md. CC-BY-SA-4.0.