What Each Dictionary Quotes
A dictionary's authority comes from its citations: the classical texts it quotes to
attest each sense. The Cologne sources mark these with <ls> tags (see
abbreviations & citations); the sibling
csl-atlas project resolved each
dictionary's own abbreviations (MBh., MBH, Mahābhārata) to shared canonical text
nodes, making citation habits comparable across dictionaries.
Pick a dictionary to see its most-quoted texts, or keep All dictionaries for the corpus-wide view.
Top 15 of 912 canonical texts, by total resolved <ls> citations across the 11 covered dictionaries (828,505 resolved citations).
Data table
| Text | Citations | Dictionaries citing it |
|---|---|---|
| Mahābhārata | 56,818 | 8 |
| Ṛgveda | 38,187 | 7 |
| Rāmāyaṇa | 38,155 | 9 |
| Manusmṛti | 26,365 | 7 |
| Aṣṭādhyāyī (Pāṇini) | 21,791 | 3 |
| Bhāgavata-Purāṇa | 21,330 | 5 |
| Śabdakalpadruma | 20,232 | 7 |
| Raghuvaṃśa | 19,922 | 7 |
| Abhidhānacintāmaṇi | 18,073 | 3 |
| Indische Sprüche | 18,030 | 4 |
| Kathāsaritsāgara | 17,015 | 9 |
| Amarakoṣa | 14,918 | 8 |
| Pañcatantra | 14,743 | 6 |
| Harivaṃśa | 13,685 | 7 |
| Medinīkośa | 13,246 | 6 |
How to read it. PWG dominates the graph (536,172 resolved citations — Böhtlingk & Roth
cited on an industrial scale); its profile is epic-heavy (Mahābhārata, Rāmāyaṇa) with
Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyāyī third — a grammarians' dictionary. AP's top text is the Raghuvaṃśa:
Apte built for readers of kāvya. BHS's citations are almost entirely Buddhist texts no other
dictionary touches. The Vedic concordances (VEI, PUI) don't appear here at all — they carry
zero <ls> tags (their citation systems are structural hymn/verse references), and
Grassmann's Rigveda references are verse numbers rather than resolvable text abbreviations.
- Evidence:
src/data/citation-sources.json, vendored byscripts/build-atlas-viz.mjsfrom the csl-atlas citation graph (ls_citation_edges.tsv+ls_citation_nodes.tsv, method in its README): 828,505 resolved<ls>citations → 912 canonical texts across 11 dictionaries (1,701 edges). - Limitations: coverage is the 11 dictionaries whose abbreviation keys resolve —
not all 43. Resolution quality varies: MW's 312k
<ls>tags currently resolve to only 5 coarse nodes (its grammatical markers are filtered, most literary abbreviations are still unresolved), and MD to 4 — read those two as placeholders, not profiles. Canonicalization is imperfect across dictionaries (MD's "Rigveda" is not yet folded into "Ṛgveda"). Counts are citation frequency, not importance. - Validation: vendored totals match the csl-atlas edge list exactly (828,505); the per-dictionary top texts were spot-checked against the TSV.
- Owner repo:
csl-atlas(data) / this repo (rendering). - Next use: if a dictionary you use is missing here, its abbreviation key is the gap — see the csl-atlas unresolved-keys worklist.
See also
- Abbreviations & citations — how
<ls>tags work - The dictionary landscape — era × novelty × size for all 43
- Corpus attestation — how often each word is actually used
- Abbreviations comparison — the per-dictionary legends the resolver uses